all four factors considered in such a stay request are satisfied. See Humane Soc’y of U.S. v. Gutierrez , 558 F.3d 896, 896 (9th Cir. 2009) (“A party seeking a stay must establish  that he is likely to succeed on the merits,  that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of relief,  that the balance of equities tip in his favor, and  that a stay is in the public interest.”
1. No way in hell Benitez will see them as likely to win.
2. Becerra suffers no harm from innocent people buying standard capacity mags.
4. Benitez already made the point that the ban was not in the public interest.
This is all set up for the appeal.
until the Judgment is stayed pending appeal, individuals will be free to acquire new LCMs, and there is evidence that sales have begun already. If Section 32310 is ultimately reinstated by the Ninth Circuit, it will be difficult for the State to remove these new LCMs.
Yep. Just like they are incapable of confiscating once-lawfully owned firearms when they even know who has what where. Unregistered mags? Ain’t happening.